How Does Your Brain Respond When You Hold Your Breath?

We all know what it feels like to run out of oxygen—or at least, what it feels like to feel like we’re running out of oxygen. In reality, the breathlessness we experience during hard exercise, or at high altitude, or when simply holding our breath, has more to do with too much carbon dioxide in the blood than with too little oxygen. As the feats of elite freedivers show—like holding a single breath for 11 minutes and 35 seconds—our limits aren’t what they seem.

I’ve long been fascinated by studies of what’s going on inside freedivers when they hold their breath, what defines their limits, and how those skills may translate to other environments like high altitude. But their abilities are so outlandish that it feels like studying another species. So I was particularly interested to see a recent study in the European Journal of Applied Physiology that looked at breath holding in regular people with no prior training in it. The study is very straightforward, taking measurements of heart rate and oxygen levels while volunteers hold their breath, and it offers a revealing picture of how the body copes with a shortage of oxygen—and what can go wrong.

The research was performed at Ghent University in Belgium, by Janne Bouten, Jan Bourgois, and Jan Boone. (I’m assuming scientists in Belgium are assigned to different departments by alphabetical order.) They asked 31 volunteers (17 men, 14, women) to hold their breath for as long as possible three times in a row, with two minutes break each time. Typically people get better and better in repeated breath holds, in part because their spleens are squeezing more oxygen-carrying red blood cells into circulation. During the third and final breath hold, they took continuous measurements of parameters including heart rate, oxygen levels in the brain, and oxygen levels in the leg muscles.

Humans, like other mammals, have a “diving response” that kicks in when you hold your breath, with the goal of making sure your brain always has enough oxygen. As the researchers point out, if your circulation stops abruptly, you’ll be unconscious within 30 seconds and suffer irreversible damage within two to ten minutes. The diving response is enhanced if your face is submerged in water, but it happens even on dry land. Your heart rate drops, and the blood vessels leading to non-essential parts of the body like your leg muscles constrict in order to redirect crucial blood (and oxygen) to the brain.

The subjects held their third breath for an average of two minutes and 37 seconds, which strikes me as incredibly good for normal untrained people. Maybe doing three breaths in a row is the secret; or maybe I’m just weak. Anyway, here’s what the average heart rate response looked like. The data is only shown for the first 60 seconds (on the left) and the last 60 seconds (on the right), which allows them to plot everyone’s data together even though they lasted differing amounts of time. The gray area indicates when they started and stopped the breath hold.

breath-hold-one_h.jpg
(Illustration: Courtesy of European Journal of Applied Physiology)

On the far left, you can see the blue dots (which represent the average value) increasing as the subjects prepare for the breath hold. This may be because they’re getting excited or apprehensive, and may also be the result of taking some deep breaths in preparation. The subjects were specifically forbidden from hyperventilating before the breath hold (which blows off a bunch of carbon dioxide, allowing you to hold your breath for longer), but they were given a 30-second warning and a 10-second countdown, and told to take a deep but not maximal breath right before starting. Within about ten seconds after starting the breath hold, heart rate is dropping. It ends up decreasing by 27 beats per minute, reaching its low point after 83 seconds on average. This is fairly similar to what you see in elite free divers, except they reach their minimum heart rate within 30 to 60 seconds.

You’ll notice a series of red dots, and another series of white dots. There are two individuals who quit early; one of them fainted, and the other got dizzy and was on the verge of fainting. More on them below.

The next parameter is tissue oxygenation in the leg muscles, as measured with near-infrared spectroscopy, which basically involves shining infrared light through the skin and measuring how much is absorbed by oxygen-rich hemoglobin. Here the picture is pretty straightforward: oxygen levels in the muscles start dropping within five seconds, and keep dropping until the subjects start breathing again. This is what you’d expect, because the blood vessels are constricting to shift blood flow away from the extremities to the brain.

breath-hold-two_h.jpg
(Illustration: Courtesy of European Journal of Applied Physiology)

The final piece of the puzzle is where things get interesting. Brain oxygenation was also measured with near-infrared spectroscopy:

breath-hold-three_h.jpg
(Illustration: Courtesy of European Journal of Applied Physiology)

Here you see an initial decrease in brain oxygen levels, perhaps related to the sudden drop in blood pressure associated with the start of a breath hold. But within about five seconds, the drop reverses and brain oxygen levels start to climb—and in fact go on to reach levels about four percent higher than baseline after about a minute. This is a pretty good indication of how powerful the brain’s self-protective wiring is: you hold your breath, and it gets more oxygen rather than less.

That happy state of affairs doesn’t last forever, though. Even as more and more blood gets shunted to the brain, that blood is carrying less and less oxygen as the breath hold proceeds, so gradually your levels of brain oxygen begin to decline. That decline continues until, eventually, you give up. On average, brain oxygen dropped by about five percent by the time the subjects gave up. Interestingly, that’s about the same level you see in elite freedivers after two and a half minutes. That means the freedivers aren’t significantly better at maintaining their brain’s oxygen levels. Instead, the difference seems to be that they’re willing to keep enduring the unpleasant urge to breathe for longer. Other research has found that freedivers are capable of holding their breath until their brain oxygen levels drop so low that they lose consciousness—a very dangerous situation if it happens underwater.

Which brings us back to the two subjects who fainted or came close to it. If you look again at the graph of brain oxygen levels, you can see that their data is way out of whack compared to everyone else’s. They have a steep drop, then manage to compensate for a little while, but the drop resumes and very soon their brain oxygen levels are so low that they reach the border of consciousness. For the red dots, the muscle oxygen data suggests that this subject had a weak response in constricting blood flow to the muscles. That means he or she kept pumping blood to the extremities and didn’t get enough to the brain. For the white dots, the data doesn’t give any hints about what went wrong, but the result was the same: not enough oxygen to the brain.

One of the rationales for the study was that some researchers and coaches have advocated various forms of breath-hold training to improve athletic or altitude performance. Since most previous breath-hold research used trained freedivers, it wasn’t clear whether the brain’s self-protection mechanisms would kick in for novices. The new data indicates that it’s okay, but the two fainters also show that caution is needed: the researchers suggest that everyone should be familiar with the warning signs of fainting (most notably dizziness), and not perform breath-hold training alone.


For more Sweat Science, join me on Twitter and Facebook, sign up for the email newsletter, and check out my book Endure: Mind, Body, and the Curiously Elastic Limits of Human Performance.

Support Outside Online

Our mission to inspire readers to get outside has never been more critical. In recent years, Outside Online has reported on groundbreaking research linking time in nature to improved mental and physical health, and we’ve kept you informed about the unprecedented threats to America’s public lands. Our rigorous coverage helps spark important debates about wellness and travel and adventure, and it provides readers an accessible gateway to new outdoor passions. Time outside is essential—and we can help you make the most of it. Making a financial contribution to Outside Online only takes a few minutes and will ensure we can continue supplying the trailblazing, informative journalism that readers like you depend on. We hope you’ll support us. Thank you.

Contribute to Outside

Lead Photo: Song Heming/Stocksy

When you buy something using the retail links in our stories, we may earn a small commission. Outside does not accept money for editorial gear reviews. Read more about our policy.